His "process" not only juxtaposes "self" and "other" in the same space, but also forms an interactive relationship between subjective and objective.
The significance of his works lies in the interpretation of the transformation of social space function as the space of body activity or expression context into the space of subjectivity and mental state production. This kind of space production still plays a role in social relations. Space practice includes all aspects of social elements and practical activities. His understanding of hybridity is not like others. He does not define cultural identity in the category of eternal value, but emphasizes that culture and identity are always in a state of flow and transformation. It is on this basis that artists constantly translate the living state of self and the other, such as order, equality, class, confusion, weakness, powerlessness and mixture, etc., and decode and encode again.
The artist boldly resisted the logical things. Instead of following the artistic rules with the objectified things, the artists imagined, combined, modified and created subjectively. His works reappear the differences, space, reality and performance, which make these concept categories and connotations produce subtle dislocation, and the chaotic and abnormal life fragments are subjectively re controlled and fabricated.
